Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221114
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 879
89% 720 Pts
64-Core 1041
64% 1041 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.6% Very good
Lighting 79.1
Reflection 125
Parallax 161
64% 122 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 81.6
Splatting 142
106% 129 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMLA.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 211 267 153 98 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 463
Write 148
Mixed 329
SusWrite 199
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 24.9
124% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 60.7
65% 112 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 32.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 34.3
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM02A4 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-B550 GAMING X V2 Builds (Compare 4,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback