Colorful H510M-T M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Colorful H510M-T M.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful H510M-T M.2
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 238 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 759 74% 607 Pts	64-Core 975 60% 975 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.2% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 158 Parallax 105 93% 126 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 120 Splatting 104 105% 132 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xstar 128GB 128GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW191129 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 157 157 280 237 175 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 209 Write 117 Mixed 259 SusWrite 203 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 13.6 82% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 99.6 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 15.9 50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 80%
Team T253256GB 256GB 779 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 238GB free Firmware: W0220A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 364 358 320 336 363 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 475 Write 422 Mixed 402 SusWrite 348 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 27 125% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 45.8 83% 162 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x16GB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 14.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	24"	1920 1080	GSM5C00 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H510M-T M.2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

System: Colorful H510M-T M.2

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	21x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	13x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	12x

GPU
RTX 3050Nvidia $250Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	11x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	3x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	5x
Empire CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBGoldenBench 81%, 708 samples	3x
Empire CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GBGoldenBench 43%, 98 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16