Skikk Green 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSkikk Green 5  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Green 5
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 11:29
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 239
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 621
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 1065
66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 124A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 21
14% 19.8 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.4
5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX600-1K0-80 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3439 3590 3611 3622 3561 902 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 1,808
Write 3,497
Mixed 2,210
SusWrite 3,121
606% 2,659 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 87.8
295% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 834
597% 777 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 388%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK48S532G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 90 14" 1280 720 CSO140C
Typical Green 5 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Skikk Green 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback