bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory3.2 GB free of 7 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 86.4
20% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 126
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 90.4
6% 90.4 Pts
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 275GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 27 104 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 47.9
Write 54.7
Mixed 123
SusWrite 63.8
55% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
210% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 93%
Virtual HD 15GB
12GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 30 97 96 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 43.5
Write 43.4
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 62.4
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
1024, 6144 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1.1
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 430
9% 430 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 6 4 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback