Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory	21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 492 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 10.5 7% 9.67 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 9.5 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH128GCST 128GB 1,729 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTFAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 282 245 273 345 354 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 472 Write 440 Mixed 420 SusWrite 302 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 31.1 95% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 301 235% 324 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 100%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 757GB free Firmware: 01.01V03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 100 101 100 101 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 114 Write 112 Mixed 108 SusWrite 100 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 3x8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 19 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2475 2475W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W530 Power Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 Power

CPU
Xeon E3-1245 v3Intel $245Bench 71%, 2,834 samples	17x
Xeon E3-1246 v3Intel $200Bench 73%, 2,511 samples	17x
Xeon E3-1276 v3Intel $300Bench 77%, 297 samples	16x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	8x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	6x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 56%, 297 samples	9x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 528 samples	7x
HMT41GU7AFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 57%, 188 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $273

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16