Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221227
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 03:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 608
68% 533 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 126
Parallax 133
115% 134 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 109
Splatting 94.1
93% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 114 115 92 115 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 412
Write 402
Mixed 284
SusWrite 140
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 34.5
117% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 293
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 110%
MII Azerty 512GB
168GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 194 31 4 356 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 416
Write 362
Mixed 315
SusWrite 219
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 9.7
62% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 16.1
70% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback