QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory19.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19.8GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory16.5 GB free of 19.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,116
100% 844 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.5% Good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 88
Parallax 77.5
75% 86 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 70.1
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 133GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,890
Write 2,492
Mixed 2,100
486% 2,161 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 39.7
147% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 150
116% 157 MB/s
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB
384GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 332 275 470 641 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 19GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 3904 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 26.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 56 60 48.5" 1920 1080 SAM0A7A SAMSUNG
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback