MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 306%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics374% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D50
MotherboardMSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 01:01
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 64.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 286
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 816
87% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,294
80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
374% Outstanding
Lighting 589
Reflection 576
Parallax 736
480% 634 fps
MRender 529
Gravity 568
Splatting 301
365% 466 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 374%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,630
Write 2,936
Mixed 2,782
624% 2,782 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 70.7
239% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1,142
856% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Pcie SSD 2TB
208GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1740 925 932 928 938 933 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,493
Write 1,785
Mixed 1566
SusWrite 1,066
334% 1,477 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 50.2
164% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,414
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 1,317
990% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 235%
Great: 309%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
247GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1505 1442 1425 1386 1393 1340 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,383
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,672
SusWrite 1,415
402% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 69.8
224% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1289
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,186
888% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 304%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1GB free
Firmware: CC29
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 166
Write 135
Mixed 86.2
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 36
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 27.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 19.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 MSI4CC0 MPG273CQR-QD
Typical MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX (MS-7D50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback