HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887A
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 23:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 205
66% 125 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 672
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 887A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.32
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 20.7
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 16.3
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 292 32 164 42 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,833
Write 1,358
Mixed 1,179
SusWrite 116
249% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 51.5
159% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 153
178% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 148%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MR-8 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 28 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1538
Typical Laptop 15s-eq2xxx Builds (Compare 1,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback