Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics239% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 446
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
239% Outstanding
Lighting 344
Reflection 335
Parallax 397
281% 359 fps
MRender 480
Gravity 301
Splatting 218
259% 333 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 239%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,295
Write 2,115
Mixed 1,687
452% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 64.2
212% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 677
515% 709 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
67GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 98 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 93.4
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 97.3
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
87GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 107 109 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 107
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 33.7
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27A7 ASUS MG279
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback