HP 500-130ez

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP 500-130ez  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 21:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 544
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.07 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 165 177 182 182 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 401
Write 180
Mixed 211
SusWrite 177
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 14.3
90% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 28.9
45% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 178 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 178
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1017 HWP288A HP 2210
Typical 500-130ez Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: HP 500-130ez

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback