bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 16:25
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 663
69% 554 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 404
Mixed 135
52% 227 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 37.1
141% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 17.9
66% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
967GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60% Good
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 101
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.41
105% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
47GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 70.3
Write 77.5
Mixed 54.1
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.38
84% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
21GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 59.6
Mixed 47.5
43% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.52
107% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D50384758334D324131363030433920 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback