MSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E05
MotherboardMSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 558
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 873D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 83.8
75% 88.7 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 71.9
70% 88 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 500GB 2G0C
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 236020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 201 206 210 207 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 1,157
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 262
219% 979 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 63.6
217% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,109
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 886
682% 935 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 179%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5752-007.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 16.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 7 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2490 G2490W1G4
Typical H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05) Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback