Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 10:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 553
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5749
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 38
32% 39.2 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 26.5
28% 35 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP3128G 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM14.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 105 91 88 93 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 528
Write 110
Mixed 155
SusWrite 93.9
48% 222 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 20.5
86% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 129
102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
674GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 129 128 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 87
Write 117
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 130
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06FB
Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback