Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 59.8 35% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 151 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M 1,652 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 21F6) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 389.08 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 1.5 4% 4.1 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 875GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 409 Write 382 Mixed 369 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 22.3 77% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 115 100% 150 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 119GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 300 Write 59.9 Mixed 81 141% 147 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 2.4 583% 7.97 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 3.2 926% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD0259

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16