Asus P10S-V Series

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P10S-V Series (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '23 at 23:54
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 2,434 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 201 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 521 55% 441 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 41.5 Parallax 37.7 31% 38.9 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 28 28% 35 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NQ100 240GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11873 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 387 381 400 395 397 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 450 Write 384 Mixed 404 SusWrite 394 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 32.7 118% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 185 146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 108%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 53GB free, PID 205a Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 31 19 24 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.6% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 26.8 SC Mixed 21.5 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	40	24	60	48.5"	1280 720	SAM0A7A SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P10S-V Series Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P10S-V Series

CPU
Core i3-6100Intel $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	1x
Xeon E3-1240 v5IntelBench 77%, 2,434 samples	1x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
SHGS31-500GS-2-KR 500GBBench 86%, 20 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBSamsungBench 62%, 17,576 samples	1x
9965669-008.A03G 1x16GBKingstonBench 41%, 48 samples	1x
M391A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 84%, 256 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16