Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMedion MS-7848  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 150
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 369
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600
MSI(1462 7848) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 252 239 237 238 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 383
Write 446
Mixed 358
SusWrite 252
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 21.2
92% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 222
185% 269 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0C0 Philips 247E4
Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback