PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X48-DQ6 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090424 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 04 '23 at 17:09 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 98% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon L3110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 117 161 129 49 48 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
27GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 51 53 55 53 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 40 | 12 | 60 | 32" | 1280 720 | SKK3130 SKK181 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 4x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $181 |