Lenovo 30GACTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive447% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30GACTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1055
Memory52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w3-2435
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 63.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 293
90% 172 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1015
93% 782 Pts
64-Core 1504
93% 1504 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Legend(17AA 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.86
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.7% Good
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 84.2
67% 86.4 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 74.9
68% 85 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3382 3137 3155 3512 3480 3502 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
447% Outstanding
Read 2,911
Write 2,660
Mixed 2,095
SusWrite 3,361
622% 2,757 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 78.2
257% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 1,065
781% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 447%
Great: 528%
SKHynix_HFS002TEJ9X162N 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 51730A10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3458 3725 3751 3638 3716 3729 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 3039
Write 2,440
Mixed 2,980
SusWrite 3,670
685% 3,032 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 101
342% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 1,127
819% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 498%
Great: 541%
Corsair Voyager GTX 1TB
311GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 353 361 355 360 358 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 366
Write 178
Mixed 245
SusWrite 355
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 21.8
73% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 134
104% 140 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST12000NM000J 00MX141 00MX141LEN 12TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: LBD6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 256 258 256 259 257 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 104% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC40F2046S1RC48BA1 1x31GB
1 of 8 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 14.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical 30GACTO1WW Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30GACTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback