Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 96
1-Core 106
2-Core 191
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 499
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1.2GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 27.6
19% 30 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 24.4
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 31 28 27 29 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 138
Write 103
Mixed 166
SusWrite 38
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 24.5
84% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 87.7
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 72.7
60% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 PRO Series 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 175 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 460
Write 244
Mixed 324
SusWrite 151
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 32.7
125% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 183
158% 232 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
170GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 77 78 76 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 58.2
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 77
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
429GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 96 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 43.4
Write 46.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 94.4
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-MGJHB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 18.9" 1280 720 ACI19D5 ASUS VW193D
Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback