Lenovo 90JL00E8MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90JL00E8MW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36E7
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 118
2-Core 212
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 449
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.4% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 54.9
48% 57.3 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 47.1
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109ADLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 81 98 82 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 698
Write 124
Mixed 178
SusWrite 93.8
59% 273 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 31.5
118% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 116
97% 142 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 131%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
87GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 87 88 85 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 138
Write 133
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 86.6
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 13.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23E1 ASUS VX239
Typical 90JL00E8MW Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90JL00E8MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback