Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 226
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 643
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,272
Write 2,140
Mixed 1716
455% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 65.1
213% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 801
581% 763 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Liteonit LCT-512 512GB
222GB free
Firmware: VSDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 239 52 83 33 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 340
Write 341
Mixed 246
SusWrite 131
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 25.9
90% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 111
96% 143 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
191GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 719 678 643 590 555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 2,074
Mixed 2,028
SusWrite 723
396% 1,765 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 70.5
226% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 843
619% 819 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 240%
Great: 410%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
46GB free
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 48 43 48 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 323
Write 82.7
Mixed 120
SusWrite 48.6
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 20.7
83% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 69
DQ Mixed 52
63% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
356GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 83 85 84 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 88.5
Write 80.6
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 83
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
978GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 138 141 140 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 136
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 31.7
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 188 53 165 0" 1280 720
Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $776
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback