Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 780
74% 612 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 121
Parallax 96.9
77% 104 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 96.8
79% 96 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
467GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 1109 1066 1083 1109 1070 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 1,464
Mixed 1065
SusWrite 1,109
308% 1,379 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 49
159% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 494
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 428
324% 436 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 212%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
388GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 1647 1626 1601 1617 1701 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1581
Write 1359
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 1,644
322% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 52.2
170% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 464
345% 459 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 237%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
248GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 412 408 425 431 338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 393
Mixed 398
SusWrite 402
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 37.7
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 332
249% 332 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95%
Great: 129%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 126 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 157
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 125
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
249% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 92%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 143 141 141 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 136
Write 150
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 144
176% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.4
217% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23" 1280 720 LEN60E9 LEN T2364tA
Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback