PC PNTGOBAM1419-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPC PNTGOBAM1419-A  (all builds)
MotherboardPC PNTGOBAM1419-A
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 00:51
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Memory 25.5
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 53.7
23% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 36.4
8-Core 41
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 65.7
4% 65.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Device(1297 2084) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 44.2
Mixed 78.8
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
18% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
231GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.3
Write 65.6
Mixed 39.2
41% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 51%
VendorC ProductCode 252GB
234GB free, PID 5678, Microdrive 256 GB
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 17.3
Write 19.9
Mixed 8
19% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.7
69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-Ind-2400 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.97% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 0.7
5% 1.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 696
6% 696 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 1 60 13.9" 1536 801 CMN14C9
Typical PNTGOBAM1419-A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: PC PNTGOBAM1419-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback