Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BNi7HG4-950
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 19:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 186
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 410
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte(1458 D003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1265 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 36
28% 42.7 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 35
Splatting 30.1
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1383 1831 2004 2094 2088 2077 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,730
Write 1,991
Mixed 1762
SusWrite 1,913
418% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 63.6
198% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 502
376% 510 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 271%
Great: 591%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 34.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 22.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 50 57.8" 1280 720 VES3700 55FHD_LCD_TV
Typical GA-MKHM17P-00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback