Lenovo 20Q5001XUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20Q5001XUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20Q5001XUS
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 17:00
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8365U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 176
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 234
35% 253 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 5075) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.4
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5108AGLA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 838
Write 803
Mixed 764
179% 802 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 38.4
126% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 224
169% 230 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 242%
SDXC 64GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 64.7
Write 29.4
Mixed 39.5
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
343% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS8266.C8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 80 33 60 13.9" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback