Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 12:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 902
85% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,456
90% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239
Asus(1043 8755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 90.9
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 82.2
74% 86.6 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 69.4
68% 85 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 57 2.1 57 55 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 450
Write 131
Mixed 83
SusWrite 44.2
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 19.4
42% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.9
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 163
91% 87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
132GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 162 141 169 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 179
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 159
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 500GB
6GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 67 66 60 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 55.1
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 59.7
71% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 41%
Apacer Portable HDD 500GB
125GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 80.6
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 84.6
93% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMWX8GD3200C16W2E 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 24.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2720 VG278
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $443
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback