Toshiba Satellite C55-A

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140428
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '23 at 08:51
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 85.8 43% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 146 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 2.6 3% 3.53 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02J0T4GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 132 129 130 145 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 417 Write 340 Mixed 323 SusWrite 158 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 25.8 87% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 89.1 97% 161 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 328GB free Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 73 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 62.3 Write 53.7 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 75.4 40% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	20	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDC4347

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-A Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-A

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	89x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	51x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	41x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	125x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	91x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	16x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	12x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16