Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210101
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 06:23
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 175
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 980
90% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 51.8
Parallax 45.9
24% 42.6 fps
MRender 52.1
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 43.9
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2A0B 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 914
Write 1,095
Mixed 902
218% 970 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 42
127% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 751
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 474
400% 587 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 212%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
193GB free
Firmware: JU0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 76 72 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 136
Write 117
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 77.9
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
225% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Adata 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 27" 1280 768 ACR0584 HA270
Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback