Biostar B75MU3B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar B75MU3B  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 06:21
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 74
2-Core 132
55% 92 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 177
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.5
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 32.4
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Valuetech Basics 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 167 170 175 177 177 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 199
Write 170
Mixed 156
SusWrite 166
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 21.7
77% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 33.1
28% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 25 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2944 HP LA2006
Typical B75MU3B Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B75MU3B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback