Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X99  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 83
2-Core 175
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 560
55% 449 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 163
Parallax 148
138% 160 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 130
Splatting 112
110% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,166
Write 1,445
Mixed 1,132
349% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 46.9
152% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 320
248% 350 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
160GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 300 301 300 301 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 443
Write 392
Mixed 339
SusWrite 312
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 37.3
120% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 320
226% 288 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 124%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 1833 1826 1822 1833 1813 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,153
Write 1,689
Mixed 1,697
SusWrite 1,655
404% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 47.3
151% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 539
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 326
254% 360 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 251%
Great: 564%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
406GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 129
Write 116
Mixed 103
SusWrite 84.2
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 85%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 176 176 177 175 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 217
Mixed 102
SusWrite 177
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
382% 3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
2TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 164 170 171 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 172
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 168
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 35.4
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 SAM707A LC27G5xT
Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback