Lenovo 20N4001PUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20N4001PUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N4001PUS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 18:48
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 57
2-Core 105
46% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 368
28% 251 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 2279) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1989
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6
Parallax 5.5
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.6
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE20512GMSP34MEAT2TA 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.8.8341
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 348 380 358 380 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,259
Write 946
Mixed 959
SusWrite 377
198% 885 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 39.3
134% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 409
327% 461 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 137%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 15.5" 1536 864 LEN40BA
Typical 20N4001PUS Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N4001PUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback