Casper Excalibur G5K

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Casper Excalibur G5K (all builds)
Motherboard	Casper Excalibur G5K
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160707
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 78.9 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 142 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 289 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Clevo(1558 1501) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 21.7 18% 22.7 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.4 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 49 47 48 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 419 Write 53.4 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 48.3 33% 154 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 18.5 64% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 22.1 DQ Mixed 32.5 40% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 59%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 93GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 76 79 76 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 59.9 Write 105 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 77.3 55% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.4 154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 670 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 23 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 20.8 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	9	196	22	60	21.5"	1536 864	AOC2260 2260WG5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Excalibur G5K Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Casper Excalibur G5K

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	69x

GPU
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	37x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	32x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	26x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	4x
S3 500G 500GBSandiskBench 92%, 12,292 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	37x
CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 273 samples	17x
CT8G4SFS8213.M8FA 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 199 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16