HP ENVY Laptop 17m-ce0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY Laptop 17m-ce0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85E5
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200806
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 192
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 293
31% 249 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
HP(103C 85E5) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2892
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.9
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 18
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 0.1
9% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 298 29 14 128 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 601
Write 431
Mixed 519
SusWrite 152
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 33.6
151% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 297
212% 273 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN176C
Typical ENVY Laptop 17m-ce0xxx Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Laptop 17m-ce0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback