Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 12:39
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 57 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 117 47% 79.8 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 379 36% 295 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.6% Below average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 49.8 46% 55.6 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 49 Splatting 0.2 22% 30.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 19 24 24 41 62 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 208 Write 672 Mixed 144 SusWrite 40.3 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 20% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6J1 16GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 23.1 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	53	120	15.5"	1280 720	AUOD0ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,847x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	985x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,369x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	951x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,163x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	409x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	593x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16