Exper ACTIVE

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Exper ACTIVE (all builds)
Motherboard	EXPER H61H2-MV
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 07:34
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	74%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 171 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 271 34% 259 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 80.1 49% 66.6 fps	MRender 59.1 Gravity 66.9 Splatting 43.9 45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD120 120GB 1,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 31 45 36 31 9.6 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 209 Write 187 Mixed 183 SusWrite 52.8 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 11.1 59% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 69.1 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 19.3 40% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$14 6,096 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 98GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 73 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 72.5 Write 74.6 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 72.9 49% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 889 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	10	60	21.5"	1920 1017	HWP3183 HP 22cw

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ACTIVE Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVE

CPU
Celeron 847Intel $259Bench 34%, 3,990 samples	5x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	5x
Celeron G1610Intel $37Bench 49%, 5,236 samples	4x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	5x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 94 samples	4x

SSD
120GB 120GBS100-spc120Bench 74%, 27 samples	3x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x
APS-SL3N-128 128GBBench 64%, 247 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905403-081.A00LF 4GBHynixBench 44%, 2 samples	2x
M2F2G64CB88G4N-CG 1x2GBNanyaBench 24%, 23 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16