Asus ROG STRIX B360-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B360-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 05:48
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,041
97% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 107
Parallax 113
100% 114 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 80.8
80% 100 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 274 262 256 257 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 474
Mixed 443
SusWrite 264
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 55.8
184% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 259
219% 320 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
184GB free
Firmware: UK400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 216 147 133 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 446
Write 368
Mixed 184
SusWrite 165
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 16.6
75% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 36.7
49% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$63
335GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 128 127 129 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 140
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 127
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 98%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
483GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 96 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 95.6
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
191% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB
440GB free
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 51.7
Write 62.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 61
36% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX Hynix.lnc HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27D4 VZ279HEG1R
Typical ROG STRIX B360-H GAMING Builds (Compare 1,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-H GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback