HP 750-114

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 750-114  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory1.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160317
Uptime43.8 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 02:35
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 158
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 235
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 86.6
Mixed 72
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.2
Write 1
Mixed 4.2
6% 7.13 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
50GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.2
Write 17.9
Mixed 21.8
29% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.2
105% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 12GB
1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 42 60 31.5" 1280 720 BBY0050 NS-32D311NA17
Typical 750-114 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback