Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 38.5 1-Core 18.8 2-Core 30.7 21% 29.3 Pts	4-Core 41.7 8-Core 44 6% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 43.5 3% 43.5 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB 988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0729A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 2.9 3.2 5.1 2.4 2.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 2,443 Write 1.5 Mixed 12 SusWrite 3.4 127% 615 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Mixed 0 96% 21 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 96%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 10GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.4 4 7.8 8.4 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	8.51% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 1.7 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 6.4 15% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 79% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.51% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	28	60	72.3"	1280 720	SNYA301 SONY TV

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16