Medion ERAZER P6605 MD61596

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER P6605 MD61596 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION N857EX1M
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180719
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 89.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 208 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 534 58% 463 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 852B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 5.8 4% 5.87 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT1000P 1TB 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 245% 618GB free (System drive) Firmware: R30A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 778 69 70 640 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,718 Write 2,102 Mixed 1,746 SusWrite 312 330% 1,470 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 94.6 4K Mixed 58.2 191% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 644 DQ Mixed 678 521% 711 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 383%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 220GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 125 97 123 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 130 Write 139 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 120 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.6 237% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 22.4 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 23.8 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	54	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD05C8

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER P6605 MD61596 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Medion ERAZER P6605 MD61596

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	2x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	3x
CT1000P 1TBNvmeBench 245%, 1,680 samples	2x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	3x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 863 samples	2x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GBCorsairBench 82%, 771 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16