Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHuananzhi X99-F8  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 21:04
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 184
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 729
64% 542 Pts
64-Core 1,668
103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
XFX(1682 9295) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.Q3.3
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 87.8
48% 72.1 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 42.6
42% 52.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 222 216 181 174 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 415
Write 390
Mixed 281
SusWrite 214
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 29.3
102% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 243
185% 251 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 105%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 245
Write 219
Mixed 132
SusWrite 101
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 1.3
55% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 46%
WD WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB
37GB free
Firmware: 8F33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 60 59 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 62.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 60.3
41% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 39%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 117 114 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 139
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 116
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
333GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 10.5
Write 17.2
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 80.6
33% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
462GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 159 158 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 158
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELF017 DELL U2410
Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback