Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 18:13
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 241
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 968
89% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,388
86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 269 293 247 224 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 388
Write 426
Mixed 265
SusWrite 242
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 36.8
129% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 241
210% 311 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 102%
Patriot P210 256 256GB
112GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 119 121 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 438
Write 376
Mixed 341
SusWrite 155
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 27.6
123% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 178
169% 260 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%
Spcc Solid State 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 417 428 394 413 421 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 404
Mixed 326
SusWrite 416
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 10.7
86% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 13.1
64% 142 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 96%
WDS250G3X0C-00SJ 250GB
57GB free
Firmware: 1111
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,759
Write 1,996
Mixed 1,529
394% 1,761 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 66.4
229% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 896
689% 941 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
377GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 115 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 131
Write 105
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 109
66% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
492GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 166 161 161 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 168
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 160
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 113%
USB3.0 320GB
297GB free, PID a001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 72.8
77% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%
USB3.0 500GB
26GB free, PID a001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 9.7 9.7 10 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 55
Write 54.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 9.9
49% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 216%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 32.4
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 28.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 30 75 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback