Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 74.2 1-Core 109 2-Core 195 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 378 44% 341 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 43.8 49% 44.7 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 44.4 46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 35 28 32 43 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 0.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 37.4 2% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Mixed 10.2 24% 6.15 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 832GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 0 0 43 49 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 49.2 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 49 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GXMP3000CL16 2x8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 3.3 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.1 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 96 42% 96 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	75	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	818x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	784x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	749x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	773x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	414x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	348x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	197x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $423

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16