Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 15:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 154
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 190
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 868F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 104
Parallax 107
89% 107 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 102
Splatting 95
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 409 417 443 451 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 330
Mixed 383
SusWrite 425
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 36.4
130% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 189
174% 264 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GS4.4032B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 29.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271C
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback