Lenovo 21E80026UK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 21E80026UK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21E80026UK
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 10:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 254
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 238
46% 313 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 22FA) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 7.2
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 8
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-1T00 1TB
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21112000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 384 397 582 672 752 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,133
Write 837
Mixed 734
SusWrite 515
180% 805 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 41.1
136% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 169
123% 163 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 126%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LK7K7@BM-BGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 13" 1280 720 CMN1301
Typical 21E80026UK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 21E80026UK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback