Lenovo 20238

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20238  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 07:17
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 41.8
27% 38.6 Pts
4-Core 73.9
8-Core 110
11% 91.9 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1.1
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14546
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 360 346 359 348 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 364
Write 383
Mixed 369
SusWrite 354
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 16.5
53% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 110
83% 112 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 12 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD033A
Typical 20238 Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback