HP Laptop 14-dq5xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-dq5xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A1F
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 04:03
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 256
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 594
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A1F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 13.9
9% 13.9 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 13
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSEJN512GA87EC0 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE36P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 671 852 782 1187 1290 1280 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 1,003
Mixed 797
SusWrite 1,010
208% 920 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 38.6
143% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 581
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 366
290% 411 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 160%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 30.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14" 1280 720 AUO403D
Typical Laptop 14-dq5xxx Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dq5xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback