Acer Aspire XC-1760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-1760  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-1760
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 16:20
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 172
2-Core 319
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 941
93% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,202
74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2475 2490 2487 2484 2487 2464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,318
Write 2,163
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 2,481
480% 2,129 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 71.2
262% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,702
DQ Write 1,113
DQ Mixed 1,371
1,032% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 387%
Great: 480%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
586GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26,102
Mixed 110
9,368% 13,106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HM250JI 250GB
84GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 53.8
Write 32.4
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 37.6
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AU008G-3200ST Kingston ACR32D4U2S1MF-8 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 31
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 26
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 20" 1280 720 HWP3056 HP P201
Typical Aspire XC-1760 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-1760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback