HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory13.3 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 275
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2661) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 31.8
19% 27.5 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 87 121 102 116 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 194
Write 157
Mixed 130
SusWrite 107
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 19.7
65% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 108
90% 128 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 50GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 0P 5R 9G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 16% 95 165 4 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07BC SAMSUNG
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback