Lattepanda Sigma

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive456% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLattepanda Sigma  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 65.8
1-Core 191
2-Core 370
107% 209 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 954
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 24.8
17% 23.8 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 18.2
18% 23 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3067 3281 3195 3289 1935 567 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 3032
Write 3,500
Mixed 2,448
SusWrite 2,556
650% 2,884 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 94.6
356% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,738
DQ Write 1,393
DQ Mixed 1512
1,146% 1,548 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 456%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
160% Outstanding
MC Read 58
MC Write 72.5
MC Mixed 60.1
182% 63.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 160%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 5 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24A5 VG248
Typical Sigma Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lattepanda Sigma

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback